Self-Text (chapter 31)
 
I think it's the people's right to take the law into their own hands! If someone breaks into the garage of a farmer with sons that want to punish the criminal themselves by giving him a beating, pouring tar on him, dipping him in feathers and tying him to the hood of a car and driving through the city, I see nothing crazy about it. It's insane that we in our own country have a law to punish those for injustices done against us, actually it's us that are punished if we do it. If I beat a man that tries to rape a neighbor woman I will get 6-12 years in prison (and if I am a "Nazi-pig" they will surely keep me for 12-21 years instead). It's insane that our parents must
sit and look at the man who raped his kids sit in prison for a short while. And in prison they get special treatment because they are not as popular among the other inmates. I cannot grasp that on the father's side he didn't kill the man. Had the father done it and if I was the law, he would get praise and honor - as he had earned it.

It is wrong that the government determines which punishment the criminal against our kids shall have! Here comes into play the code of honor and our sense of justice. Honor is more worthy than life, so if a man rapes a kids he has insulted the child's and parent's honor. This honor is more worthy than the rapists' shitty and sick life, it is only right and just that he must pay with his miserable life, for his crime. The jewish authority however "punishes" him with only a few months in jail only to send him out into the sick society again. "Maybe he can be healthy again," "maybe his pedophilia was only temporary," and such ridiculous arguments the jewish authority claims. It doesn't matter what he is, or what he can become, as
long as he has done something so mean as to assault a child, his life has no right! (once a rapist, always a rapist). The reason he has no affection, if he had a hard childhood and became himself raped as a child, then that's their excuse. If he had become a rapist because of this, then of course it's a pity for him, but even worse for those he assaults, and it's not an excuse. It serves the victim's family honor if they kill him themselves, certainly only if they wish it.

If a father wishes not to kill the man that rapes his child - he ought to take it as a strong sign that he himself is spiritually backwards and sick. Sympathy and mercy towards the assaulter is a jewish christian weak spiritual defect. The same is considered of forgiveness. When punishing one who rapes adults the most simple punishment is to cut off his manhood. Then all can be certain he will not repeat the crime. If a father or someone else in the family wishes to avenge the rapist more severely, I believe it ought
to be completely up to the father and rest of the family to determine it themselves. The jewish authority shall not come and punish someone because the one who attacked one of his family members is punished by them. If they give him a beating or if they cut him in small pieces it's completely up to them, it doesn't have anything to do with the government. Such honorless behavior like the assaulters show is not something we can accept. They show no mercy toward the victims, so why should we give them any? By "punishing" them with only a couple of years in prison it shows how much the jewish authority tolerances this. To say anything else is foolishness. One such authority doesn't wish that I shall guide our land.